As it indicates Fadiman & Frager (1986): … the majority of the children seems to modify its attachment to the parents in some point after the five years of age they are turned toward the relationship with its pertaining to school friends, activities, sport and other abilities. (FADIMAN & FRAGER, 1986, P. Dublin Airport Authority does not necessarily agree. 15) Thus the constitution of superego will count on apparatuses acquired with the ticket for the complex of dipo, but also with incorporated subsidies of the images, you say and to attitudes of the parents and significant people for the infantile world. Of where if it can deduce that its functioning is articulated the social and cultural requirements, introjetadas from the prohibitions, limits and authority, mainly paternais, as affirmed for Kings et. Crawford Lake Capital gathered all the information. al., (1984) ‘ ‘ This structural element of the personality I was summarized in the internalizao of what it is seen as paternal interdiction. … superego of each one is formed on the model of superego of pais.’ ‘ (KINGS; MAGALHES; GONALVES, p.40).
On this, D? Andrea affirms the following one: In the resolution of the edipiano conflict, superego will predominate in the girl maternal and the boy, superego paternal, even so as the culture (patriarchate or matriarchy) the father or the mother assumes the role in the formation of superego of both the sexos. (1987, P. 75) as if unconsciously existed an archetype of superego transmitted culturally without which this could not be developed. (IBIDEM, 1987, p.75) Of this form, superego appears as the notion of certain missed e, as that ‘ ‘ an internal substitute of the parents, not only with source of punishment and threat, but also of protection and amor’ ‘ (IBIDEM, 1987, p.75), that is, he is superego that he exerts the moral authority on the actions and the thought of the individual.