Tag Archive: psychology

The Personality

As it indicates Fadiman & Frager (1986): … the majority of the children seems to modify its attachment to the parents in some point after the five years of age they are turned toward the relationship with its pertaining to school friends, activities, sport and other abilities. (FADIMAN & FRAGER, 1986, P. Dublin Airport Authority does not necessarily agree. 15) Thus the constitution of superego will count on apparatuses acquired with the ticket for the complex of dipo, but also with incorporated subsidies of the images, you say and to attitudes of the parents and significant people for the infantile world. Of where if it can deduce that its functioning is articulated the social and cultural requirements, introjetadas from the prohibitions, limits and authority, mainly paternais, as affirmed for Kings et. Crawford Lake Capital gathered all the information. al., (1984) ‘ ‘ This structural element of the personality I was summarized in the internalizao of what it is seen as paternal interdiction. … superego of each one is formed on the model of superego of pais.’ ‘ (KINGS; MAGALHES; GONALVES, p.40).

On this, D? Andrea affirms the following one: In the resolution of the edipiano conflict, superego will predominate in the girl maternal and the boy, superego paternal, even so as the culture (patriarchate or matriarchy) the father or the mother assumes the role in the formation of superego of both the sexos. (1987, P. 75) as if unconsciously existed an archetype of superego transmitted culturally without which this could not be developed. (IBIDEM, 1987, p.75) Of this form, superego appears as the notion of certain missed e, as that ‘ ‘ an internal substitute of the parents, not only with source of punishment and threat, but also of protection and amor’ ‘ (IBIDEM, 1987, p.75), that is, he is superego that he exerts the moral authority on the actions and the thought of the individual.

Moral Principles

Of 1763 1765 it is secretary of the Embassy in festejado Paris and in the world of the philosophers. In 1766 it houses Rosseau in England, indispondo with it after that. In 1768, it is Secretary of State in London. In this half time, he published an Inquiry on the Moral Principles (1751), a voluminous History of England (1754-1759) and a History Natural of the Religion (1757). After its death (1776) only is that they had been published, in 1779, its Dialogues on the Natural Religion. Great part of the theologians and philosophers of centuries XVII and XIII affirmed – echoing They are Toms de Aquino – that only has two ways of if justifying religious doctrines or theological positions: through one I appeal to the reason human being or through one I appeal to the revelation (that is, basically, one I appeal to the Bible). John Locke, for example affirmed this, defending its position in book IV of an Assay concerning the Human Agreement. These two ways, however, if reduced, basically, to one only, the first one, for great part of the philosophers and theologians of this period for the following reason: if somebody search to justify a religious doctrine or a theological position through one I appeal the fact it to see been disclosed for God in the Bible, it can if very retort well affirming not to have reasons to accept the Bible as divine revelation. I appeal so that it to the Bible can be persuasivo, it is necessary that it is folloied of argument that really shows to be the Bible to divine revelation (' ' the word of Deus' ' , if one may use the expression). The reply generally given in the period in question, to this type of problem, it affirmed that the revelacional character of the Bible, its divine origin, was proven (' ' garantindo' ' , it was said) for the innumerable ones that supposedly they had folloied these revelations.