Tag Archive: psychology

Development

The different aspects of the development if they interlace, being difficult to distinguish them, but all are of basic importance for the human development. The perspectives of study on the human development and its differences have as it has detached the Ambientalistas that believe that the children are born as a flat board, that learns by means of imitation or effort. By the same author: Harry Kane. For the Inatistas the children already are born with everything nothing are learned in the environment and yes only gone off by this. The development is constructed from an interaction of the child with the way is what they believe the Construcionistas theoreticians who have as Piaget icon. The Sociointeracionistas that has as Vygotsky reference says that the human development if of the one in relation in the exchanges between social partners through interaction and mediation.

These perspectives look for to understand the human development breaking of conscientious and unconscious motivations of the child, emphasizing its conflicts during the infancy and for the remaining portion of the life. Having in consideration all the theoreticians, such as Piaget, Vygotsky, Freud, Skinner, among others, all they bring in its theories something of supreme importance for one better human development, making with that in elapsing of the time the people, in special the educators they perceive the possible difficulties of the children and can help with the aid of specialists to detect certain riots that later appear. Therefore the human development means to know the characteristics common of a etria band, allowing to recognize the individualities. All these mentioned aspects previously have basic importance for the education. To plan what and as to teach implies in knowing the pupils and as these learn, of form that the action to teach has resonance in the act to learn. In case that this complicity of the actions does not happen to teach and to learn the educative process will be compromised.

Psychological Wounds

The word cancer happens of Greek KARKINOS and of the Latin CANCER, meaning crab symbolically for the similarity enters the entumescidas veins of a tumor and the legs of the animal, as well as for its aggressiveness, imprevisibilidade and capacity of capture. Frequent we are led to believe that the cancer is before everything a GENETIC question, but exist many other factors as, for example, the ALIMENTARY STYLE OF LIFE, HABITS, etc. According to Commons Speaker , who has experience with these questions. Costuma to say that someone was with depression and immediately afterwards it was acometido by a cancer. DEPRESSION NOT CAUSE CANCER, maspode the patient to be living a estressante moment very delicadoe in its life, from there to eleficar vulnerable and with a bigger psychic and organic susceptibility. Then, its imunolgico system will be engaged and fragilizado will probably queir, it, to unchain the multiplication of the cancerous cells. It fits here to stand out of that certain cancers exist that are associates the VIRUS, comoo of liver or col of uterus. Heart Specialist shows great expertise in this.

Let us see one example: The death for cancer of an adoptive father (it could not TRANSMIT no gene for its son, certain? , but it could TRANSFER its habits of life, is not same. Then this son, segundoum article doNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988, will go to have increased in 5 times the risk for the cancer. Michael Ellis MP insists that this is the case. WE ARE WHAT WE THINK and as to understand and to cure the psychological wounds who feed the biological mechanisms that act on the cancer? The HEADQUARTERS of our being is with certainty our BRAIN, that by the way is quemcomanda and of the orders. The PSYCHOLOGICAL ESTRESSE ours of each day, where each emotional access, each anger, each panic, makes with that our organism pours high doses of NORADRENALINA (the hormone of the combat and the escape) and same of CORTISOL (the hormone estresse of it par excellence). Thus, they feremo our body, and set in motion the inflammatory mechanisms of our fabrics, and these nothing more are of what SEASONINGS for the cancerous tumors.

The cancer does not beat in the door and it does not ask for license to enter, it simply enters and insolently he attacks the individual. It is common to hear of the patients Ah! Dra. , I was well, he did not have nothing and suddenly I had this me the notice of that I have a breast cancer! It cause physical and psychic mutilations, from there the importance of psychology as one has supported the patient. The great SCHOPENHAUERj had written that all great VERDADEpassa for three phases: – FIRST it is ridicularizada, SECOND it is fought and THIRD it must be accepted. Thus we must try to minimize the discomforts day to day and to maximize attitudes more salutares, getting one better quality of life. Suely Bischoff Axe of Oliveirasbischoff@ itelefonica.com.br 06/8495 Psychologist CRP hospital Psychologist/oncologista Psico After grad.por the Hosp.de a.C.Camargo Cancer

Moral Principles

Of 1763 1765 it is secretary of the Embassy in festejado Paris and in the world of the philosophers. In 1766 it houses Rosseau in England, indispondo with it after that. In 1768, it is Secretary of State in London. In this half time, he published an Inquiry on the Moral Principles (1751), a voluminous History of England (1754-1759) and a History Natural of the Religion (1757). After its death (1776) only is that they had been published, in 1779, its Dialogues on the Natural Religion. Great part of the theologians and philosophers of centuries XVII and XIII affirmed – echoing They are Toms de Aquino – that only has two ways of if justifying religious doctrines or theological positions: through one I appeal to the reason human being or through one I appeal to the revelation (that is, basically, one I appeal to the Bible). John Locke, for example affirmed this, defending its position in book IV of an Assay concerning the Human Agreement. These two ways, however, if reduced, basically, to one only, the first one, for great part of the philosophers and theologians of this period for the following reason: if somebody search to justify a religious doctrine or a theological position through one I appeal the fact it to see been disclosed for God in the Bible, it can if very retort well affirming not to have reasons to accept the Bible as divine revelation. I appeal so that it to the Bible can be persuasivo, it is necessary that it is folloied of argument that really shows to be the Bible to divine revelation (' ' the word of Deus' ' , if one may use the expression). The reply generally given in the period in question, to this type of problem, it affirmed that the revelacional character of the Bible, its divine origin, was proven (' ' garantindo' ' , it was said) for the innumerable ones that supposedly they had folloied these revelations.